I already warned seamen on their vulnerability to vaccination, due to the specifics of their job and legal status: … seamen can’t refuse inoculation, under the threat of becoming an illegal person with invalid papers, incapable of leaving or boarding the ship. http://www.maritimebulletin.net/2020/10/15/time-to-say-goodbye-to-ships/
I strongly believe, that each and every seaman must at least, know, all available information related to vaccination. So far, the majority of seamen know only one side of the story, as presented by mainstream everything, from media to elites and politicians. Well, there’s another side, which seems to be much closer to truth, or be the truth, the side libeled by mainstream as “conspiracy theory”. Tens of thousands of medics, researchers and pharma professionals, already voiced their deepest concerns over a possible disastrous outcome of looming vaccination – “Over 30,000 medical doctors and related experts have signed the Great Barrington Declaration calling out proven irregularities and expressing grave concerns”. Not to mention “deadly virus” being a hoax and therefore, absolutely unnecessary and criminal in its’ core, mandatory vaccination to “fight” it, there are even more grave, more scary considerations, reasons, to be afraid of, and to resist, this vaccination. Some 100 pharma companies joined the multi-Billion dollar race to develop and produce this unnecessary vaccine. What is it they will produce? How harmful it will be? All WEF/UN/Globalists are talking about, is overpopulation and overconsumption. They’re obsessed with radical population reduction – with worldwide genocide of unprecedented, unheard of, scale. Will first vaccination be more or less innocuous, or will they attack mankind with this first one? Or jab us with deadly injection later, during second, third, fourth… mandatory vaccinations? Nobody knows. They don’t know themselves. Anything may come up, in form of this first vaccine, any result is possible, from rather mild side effects to mass deaths. So, please, read below latest information on vaccines, and an open letter of Big Pharma whistleblower to UK’s Health Minister.
Read it all, carefully. Be in touch with reality, not with mainstream twisted, fake reality of lies and deceptions. Do your own homework and think for yourself, don’t let them decide for you. I know, that the majority of seamen either remain ignorant, or prefer to believe mainstream, because nice lies are much better for perception than bitter, scary truth. Well, it’s up to you. remain in your slumber or wake up. You will wake up in any case, but remaining ignorant until the very end reduces your survival odds, greatly.
Addressing shipping elites – do you believe, that you’re immune to vaccines, that you will be spared, because you’re part of the selected ones? Very top ones probably are, for the time being, but the majority of you are as dispensable, as we, mortal smelly commons. Maybe it’s high time for you too, to listen to your survival instincts, and join the resistance – passive or active, whatever. Waking up is already resistance. We’re all together on one ship now, shipping elites, and our ship is heading straight into disaster, with maniacs at her helm.
Top Pfizer Whistleblower Trashes Company’s Vaccine ‘Breakthrough’ Spin
Yesterday (ER: Nov.9), Pfizer announced to much media fanfare that it has a breakthrough in the search for a reliable COVID-19 vaccine, claiming studies showed it can prevent 90% of people contracting the virus. But respected former vice-president of Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, raises serious concerns.
“As a founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, Dr. Yeadon has more than three decades of experience and expertise in the research and development, as well as in the areas of biochemistry, toxicology, including the development of new drugs and treatment. Dr. Yeadon believes that the data regarding COVID 19 that most governments rely are “fake” and mostly impossible to be validated objectively. Sad to say, despite all these debacles about a fake pandemic, many governments in various parts of the world still continue to defend this coronavirus rhetoric no matter how absurd their justifications are.”
Dr Yeadon’s letter to the UK Health Minister reads:
“Dear Mr. Hancock,
I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco – acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D.
I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset.
All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months.
If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.
This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information. My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t). Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development – should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis. That’s my concern.
And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be, six months or a year or longer after dosing.
You have literally no data on this & neither does anyone else.
It isn’t that I’m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing. No: it is that you have no idea what will happen, yet despite this, you’ll be creating the impression that you do.
Several of the vaccine candidates utilise novel technology which have not previously been used to create vaccines. There is therefore no long term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it’s reasonable to expedite development & to waive absent safety information on this occasion.
I am suspicious of the motives of those proposing expedited use in the wider human population. We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity & mortality from acquiring this virus.
Volunteers from these groups only should be provided detailed information about risk / benefit, including the sole point I make here. Only if informed consent is given should any EXPERIMENTAL vaccine be used.
I don’t trust you. You’ve not been straightforward & have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis.
You’re still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines?
Dr. Michael Yeadon